{"id":5649,"date":"2022-09-24T23:25:50","date_gmt":"2022-09-24T23:25:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/?p=5649"},"modified":"2022-10-27T05:48:51","modified_gmt":"2022-10-27T05:48:51","slug":"nyrb-publisher-edwin-frank-on-the-pilgrim-hawk-subtlety-and-ferocity-despair-and-some-genuine-camp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/?p=5649","title":{"rendered":"NYRB publisher Edwin Frank on “The Pilgrim Hawk”: “Subtlety and ferocity, despair, and some genuine camp.”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
Edwin Frank: “A book of concrete observations and endless reflections and lapidary sentences.”<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Stanford\u2019s Another Look book club<\/a> has often showcased New York Review Books’ excellent offerings, so as we celebrate the tenth anniversary of the Stanford book event series, we’re pleased that our fall event on October 5 will feature Glenway Wescott<\/a><\/span>‘s too-little-known 1940 novella, The Pilgrim Hawk: A Love Story<\/a><\/u><\/em>. <\/strong>New York Review Books founder Edwin Frank (and, incidentally, he’s also a former Stanford Stegner Fellow), agreed to answer a few questions about the book, one of he first NYRB Classics published in 2001. <\/strong><\/strong> (The Book Haven also ran an interview, \u201cGreat literature is literature that remains news<\/a><\/span><\/strong>,” between Edwin Frank<\/a><\/strong> and another Stanford alum, Daniel Medin<\/a><\/span>, at Shakespeare & Company in Paris, 2016, here<\/a><\/span>.)<\/strong>

Another Look was launched in November 2012, with William Maxwell’<\/a>s So Long See You Tomorrow<\/a>. <\/em>Tobias Wolff<\/a><\/span>, founding director of Another Look, talked about his choice in a short video here<\/a><\/span>. Our tenth anniversary event for Wescott’s novel will take place at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, October 5, at Levinthal Hall in the Stanford Humanities Center<\/a>, 424 Santa Teresa Street, on the Stanford campus. The event will also be livestreamed. Come celebrate our tenth with us! It’s not to late to register here<\/a><\/span><\/strong>, for the virtual and live event. Walk-ins are always welcome, too.<\/strong>

The panelists will include a special guest, Steve Wasserman<\/span><\/a>, former book editor at the Los Angeles Times Book Review<\/em> and editor at large for the Yale University Press, and now publisher of Heyday Books in Berkeley. Other panelists will include: Stanford Prof. Robert Pogue Harrison<\/span><\/a>, author, director of Another Look, host of the radio talk show and podcast series Entitled Opinions, <\/em>and a regular contributor to the New York Review of Books<\/em>; Stanford Prof. Tobias Wolff<\/span><\/a>, one of America\u2019s leading writers, founding director of Another Look, and a recipient of the National Medal of Arts. Author Cynthia L. Haven<\/span><\/a>, a National Endowment for the Humanities public scholar, will round out the panel.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The interview with Edwin Frank …<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

CYNTHIA HAVEN:<\/strong> Wescott\u2019s prose is meticulous, keenly observed, epigrammatic, profound \u2013 and often very funny. Do we have any idea how he wrote? How he crafted this perfect novel? His papers and manuscripts are at Yale, do they give us any idea?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

EDWIN FRANK<\/strong>: I don\u2019t know how Wescott worked and haven\u2019t seen the papers. Nor am I conversant with the details of his life, except in the vaguest way, and I hadn\u2019t even realized that Yvor Winters<\/a><\/span><\/strong> was his mentor. Interesting! As to his neglect as a writer, in America, or perhaps anywhere, not writing a lot, and essentially giving up writing novels, as Wescott did, is not a great recipe for a career as a writer. Why he wrote so little is another question\u2014I don\u2019t know the answer\u2014though both Pilgrim Hawk<\/em> (with its ambisexual Alex) and Apartment in Athens<\/em> can be read as tales of the closet, suggesting that Wescott found himself more and more caught out by not being able to write frankly as a gay man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

HAVEN:<\/strong> Pilgrim Hawk <\/em>features a lot of complicated relationships: painful love, unhappy love, unrequited love, non-existent love\u2014often suggested in glances, or a quip, or in silence. How much do you think this evasiveness reflects Wescott\u2019s own ambiguities, as a gay man at a time when it was far less acceptable than it is today? <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

FRANK<\/strong>: The Pilgrim Hawk<\/em> is clearly enough about frustration, in love and as a writer. Counting the triangles it traces is an interesting exercise: there\u2019s Madeleine, Larry, and Lucy; Jean, Eva, and Rickert; Tower, Alex, and Tower\u2019s brother (and one might treat these three triangles as constituting a higher order triangle in their own right of different\u2014or are they all alike at some level?\u2014kinds of marriage); and perhaps most importantly, Tower, Alex (and all the rest of them for that matter), and The Pilgrim Hawk<\/em>, the story of a day (and his life) that Tower finally can be deemed to have put down  (though the narrator of a book is never quite its writer, close as they may be), fulfilling himself as observer, even as central to his observation is his own inability to love. The narrator is left as one of \u201cThe lovers [who are] to be pitied…are those who have no one to hate, whose rough shooting can take place only in the imagination, and never ends\u201d (page 34). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
“More and more caught out by not being able to write frankly as a gay man.”<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The rough shooting was about to hit a different order of magnitude in 1940…<\/strong>

FRANK<\/strong>:\u201cRough shooting\u201d reminds me that the book also has World War II in the background, and here another triangle can be discerned, between the late 20s, when the action takes place\u2014the past\u20141940, the date of narration and of publication, when the war had begun but the U.S. had yet to enter it\u2014the present\u2014and the future, undetermined apart from the war going on (perhaps parallel to the narrator\u2019s loveless future). In that light the book can be read as a very subtle allegory of the feckless fashionable interwar years that the Cullens, and Alex\u2019s showy but \u201cnot splendid\u201d house with its big glass modern windows, epitomizes, as the senile French politician in the chateau next door does the corruption of the Belle Epoque. Implicit is the question of what future is there for the world at war (so ostentatiously charted in the first paragraph) and what kind of world was it that led to that war. (You could read the book alongside Civilization and Its Discontents<\/em>.) But this question is very much implicit, and maybe I am making too much of it, though the central presence of the hawk inevitably puts questions of entrapment and predation in the air (or on a bloodstained gloved hand). The narrator\u2019s predatory gaze is also emphasized increasingly throughout. 

But as Michael Cunningham<\/strong> nicely says in the introduction the poor hawk is doomed from the get-go to be a symbol and yet triumphs for all that, becoming, in the telling, wonderfully, electrically, real and distinct. Those burning claws! And there is a lot of edgy, self-aware humor, too: \u201cStill, I felt rather as if I had a great thought of death concentrated and embodied and perched on me\u201d (page 47). Rather!

A book of concrete observations and endless reflections and lapidary sentences: “She said this in a great sad false way\u201d (page 88); “airy murderess like an angel; young predatory sanguinary deluxe hen\u201d (page 94).

HAVEN <\/strong>:The falcon\u2019s name Lucy is usually linked with Walter Scott\u2019s novel, The Bride of Lammermoor<\/em>. But it also has associations with Donizetti\u2019s opera Lucia di Lammermoor. <\/em>Its final act is one of the most frenzied in all opera. Certainly Westcott\u2019s fierce and ominous Lucia has a good deal of madness about her. Can you channel Westcott for a moment and connect the Lucys\u2014Wescott’s Lucy with Scott’s and Donizetti’s?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

FRANK<\/strong>: There is nothing subtle about Donizetti\u2019s Lucia, but there is nothing but subtlety in Wescott\u2019s book, subtlety and ferocity, despair, and some genuine camp. That mix, so unusual, may explain why its audience has always been a little select. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

REGISTER HERE FOR THE EVENT!<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Go HERE<\/a><\/span> to read more about it!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our October 5 event is sponsored by Stanford Continuing Studies, the Stanford Humanities Center, and the Division of Literatures, Cultures, and Languages.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Stanford\u2019s Another Look book club has often showcased New York Review Books’ excellent offerings, so as we celebrate the tenth anniversary of the Stanford book event series, we’re pleased that our fall event on October 5 will feature Glenway Wescott‘s too-little-known 1940 … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5649","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5649","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5649\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anotherlook.stanford.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}